Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Should we close Menzieshill High?


Dundee's Education Department has proposed the closure of Menzieshill High School, and parents and the community are being consulted via meetings and online surveys. As councillors we will take our decisions when the consultation responses come in.

I've been at two 'official' meetings and one protest meeting, listened to parents' arguments for keeping the school open, tried to respond to those who simply cannot understand why the council would close such a popular school.

There are some debates about practical matters like transport which I think the Council can deal with. The bigger picture is about the quality of education.

In the US there is a strong lobby for smaller schools; people think there is less pupil violence and higher levels of achievement if schools are small. On the other hand, Dundee's Education Department believes Menzieshill pupils will achieve more in the new, bigger school.

I try not to just accept what council officials tell me, so I went looking for independent research and found a 2002 report from the National Foundation for Educational Research (http://www.nfer.ac.uk/nfer/publications/SPP01/SPP01.pdf).

115 pages later, I discovered there is very little evidence to suggest that big schools are better than small schools, or that small schools are better than big schools. It does seem fairly clear that bigger schools are more cost effective and can offer a wider range of subjects.

Then I looked up Parentzone (http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/parentzone/) and checked how well the pupils in Menzieshill do in exams, compared to Harris. Generally Harris is above the Scottish average, sometimes well above. Menzieshill is generally below the average.

I believe this is because Harris Academy is not truly a local school. Harris has a role of 940, and of those 490 live outside the Harris catchment. My guess is that parents with high aspirations for their children are bypassing their local schools and sending their children to Harris. To put it bluntly, Harris has higher numbers of clever kids. Already 150 pupils from the Menzieshill catchment choose to go to Harris.

So what would it mean to close Menzieshill? Harris would be full of children from its new catchment area ... Lochee, Menzieshill, West End, parts of Coldside and the city centre. There would be very little room for pupils from other parts of the city. Harris would be a real, local school.

Menzieshill pupils would have the chance to be educated in a state of the art building with better facilities (although Harris sports pitches are at a distance from the school, it will have a brand new pool, dance studios, music rooms and a recording studio, among other excellent features).

In future, pupils living in the catchment areas of Baldragon, Craigie High and Braeview would be much more likely to send their children to their local school, and those schools would benefit from having a more balanced intake. Plus the Council would eventually save nearly £2 million a year and avoid the inevitable costs of upgrading an old school.

So everyone wins? Well, maybe. It's clear that there is strong opposition from a significant portion of Menzieshill parents, and some pupils. I have very little idea what the Harris parents think because very few turned up to the consultation meeting. I'd be interested to know what the Harris pupils think about it all. Some Rosebank parents do not want to see families split between Morgan and Harris, and we're working on that.

No decisions can be taken until the consultation is over, and I strongly urge people to send in their views. The consultation paper is at http://www.dundeecity.gov.uk/content/closure-menzieshill-high-school and the email address to use is education@dundeecity.gov.uk.

Personally I am beginning to think that closure is the best option, because the pupils in Menzieshill and Lochee will have better opportunities to learn and thrive in a brand new building with a long tradition of excellence. But I haven't made up my mind yet, and the debate continues.






No comments: